{"id":4902,"date":"2021-12-10T11:59:33","date_gmt":"2021-12-10T16:59:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tempestmag.org\/v01_2020\/staging\/?p=4902"},"modified":"2022-11-06T11:07:23","modified_gmt":"2022-11-06T16:07:23","slug":"on-not-expelling-jamaal-bowman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/2021\/12\/on-not-expelling-jamaal-bowman\/","title":{"rendered":"On (not) expelling Jamaal Bowman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"dropcap\">F<\/span>ollowing weeks of public calls for censure and expulsion, the crisis in the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) over the actions of DSA member and congressional representative Jamaal Bowman has come to a close. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dsausa.org\/statements\/on-the-question-of-expelling-rep-bowman\/\">Bowman will not be expelled<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Beginning with the Madison, Wisconsin chapter on October 30, 28 DSA chapters and 11 Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA) chapters <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patreon.com\/posts\/58751601\">issued open letters<\/a> or signed onto <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patreon.com\/posts\/58934510\">statements<\/a> calling for disciplinary action on Bowman. These cited his votes enabling $4 billion in direct military aid to the state of Israel, repeated attacks on boycott, divest, and sanction (BDS) tactics and the Palestinian solidarity movement, and a propaganda tour to Israel with liberal Zionist organization J-Street.<\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patreon.com\/posts\/59408861\">momentum built<\/a>, DSA\u2019s BDS and Palestine Working Group (BDSWG) issued their <a href=\"https:\/\/palestine.dsausa.org\/bowmans-j-street-zionist-propaganda-trip-to-apartheid-israel-must-not-stand\/\">first statement<\/a> on November 17, 2021 demanding that DSA\u2019s leadership, the National Political Committee (NPC), expel Bowman unless he agreed to three demands (honor BDS; vote against any legislation that would harm Palestine; and observe the travel boycott). BDSWG had been speaking with Bowman for months following his vote for the <a href=\"https:\/\/rampantmag.com\/2021\/10\/iron-domes-deadly-lessons\/\">Iron Dome missile defense system<\/a>, trying to move him on his positions on Israel to no avail. On November 18, opponents of disciplining Bowman issued their own statement (<a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1d_FBOWt5JqyFvQn5BQuqDBvLe67rLCXKbI0CABhJHx4\/edit\">\u201cFor Unity, Not Unanimity\u201d<\/a>). No chapters voted to endorse the <i>For Unity<\/i> statement, though it did include high profile elected officials, such as Jabari Brisport and Julia Salazar, amidst its supporters.<\/p>\n<p>The NPC and BDSWG met with Bowman on November 19, who, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thenation.com\/article\/politics\/jamaal-bowman-dsa-israel\/\"><i>The Nation<\/i><\/a>, refused to accept the demands but pledged some desire to continue working for a resolution. However, on November 29 (International Day of Palestinian Solidarity), Bowman went through with his scheduled J-Street town hall, prompting a <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/@dsapalestinesolidarity\/dsa-bds-working-group-formally-calls-for-the-expulsion-of-rep-jamaal-bowman-fa92eba6854a\">second statement<\/a> from BDSWG demanding expulsion. The NPC reportedly held a private meeting with Bowman and announced a statement would be made on December 2.<\/p>\n<p>In the lead-up to the NPC statement, Jacobin magazine published an <a href=\"https:\/\/jacobinmag.com\/2021\/11\/democratic-socialists-j-street-bds-israel-palestine-iron-dome-aoc\">editorial against expulsion<\/a> and refused to publish a <a href=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/2021\/12\/do-comrades-cross-picket-lines\/\">response<\/a>. Soon after, <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/ali-abunimah\/dsa-fails-palestine-test-giving-jamaal-bowman-pass\"><i>Electronic Intifada<\/i><\/a> notes,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>several Palestinians and Arab Americans stepped in to shield the New York Democrat from growing grassroots anger over his support for Israel\u2026They included James Zogby, longtime Democratic Party stalwart and president of the Arab American Institute, and his former deputy<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/OmarBaddar\/status\/1466507536744472578\"> Omar Baddar<\/a>\u2026Waleed Shahid, a senior Democratic Party strategist, touted Zaknoen DeReus [director of the Institute for Middle East Understanding]\u2019s intervention as a reason to oppose the expulsion of Bowman from DSA.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On December 2, BDS National Committee appeared to adjust their position, moving from describing BDS as a <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BDSmovement\/status\/1461764402408009740\">picket line<\/a> not to be crossed to a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BDSmovement\/status\/1466490844475797506\">context specific<\/a>\u201d tactic, just in time to be cited in the statement delivered that day by the NPC, declaring that they had \u201cdecided not to expel Bowman.\u201d The NPC used the interventions as justification of a \u201cboth sides\u201d narrative to ultimately reject expulsion.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"pullquote\">Though the NPC \u201cstrongly condemn[ed]\u201d Bowman\u2019s actions, he remains a member. The work of the statement is in trying to mitigate the conflict and deliver the news that it&#8217;s going to be status quo without incurring too much pushback.<\/aside>\n<h4><b>On Not Expelling Bowman<\/b><\/h4>\n<p>It should be clear that the Palestinian solidarity movement was largely in favor of the calls for expulsion. The organization BDS Boston (not affiliated to DSA) wrote a <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1L2yPqMJ5dZ91cEkAaQLzWziFjLMqiUtHO3mRNhKQLoI\/edit\">public letter<\/a> to Boston DSA warning them that language in the <i>For Unity<\/i> document that many in Boston DSA had signed \u201cmirrors Zionist talking points which aim to drive a wedge between the demands of the Palestinian people (for BDS) and organizers internationally who want to act in solidarity.\u201d Organizations such as the Arab Resource &amp; Organizing Center (AROC), Falastiniyat, National Students for Justice in Palestine, Jews for Right of Palestinian Return, Palestinian Youth Movement, and Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network all signed BDSWG\u2019s letter calling for expulsion.<\/p>\n<p>The NPC gives no indication of this. Their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dsausa.org\/statements\/on-the-question-of-expelling-rep-bowman\/\">statement<\/a>, \u201cOn the Question of Expelling Congressman Bowman\u201d, buries the lede that they are <i>not<\/i> expelling Bowman beneath 500 words that state that Bowman\u2019s actions are inexcusable, immediately followed by excuses that negate the sentiment. The statement continues in evasive Human Resources-parlance, without recognition of the groundswell of chapters discussing, voting, and calling for discipline, nor the weight of the movement behind separating Bowman\u2019s membership in DSA. There is no mention of the months of conversation between BDSWG and Bowman nor that their decision to call for expulsion was the result of no movement on his part, and in fact further provocation from Bowman.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4903\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4903\" style=\"width: 705px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4903 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/salaita.png\" alt=\"Tweet by Steven Salaita: &quot;Bear in mind: the DSA needs Palestine much more than Palestine needs the DSA.&quot;\" width=\"705\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/salaita.png 705w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/salaita-600x383.png 600w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/salaita-300x191.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 705px) 100vw, 705px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4903\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Writer and Palestinian Solidarity Activist Steven Salaita has been a vocal critic of DSA\u2019s handling of the Bowman affair.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The NPC did not direct chapters to discuss the question and report votes, nor did they issue a poll on the question (as they have the power to do in the existing bylaws). The discussion was considered off the table, and the statement is instruction that the question for them is now closed. While an unprecedented movement of chapters calling for action suggested a growing consensus, we cannot in fact know what the majority position was among members, because there was no interest in finding out. The NPC\u2019s vote is not shared, though <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffpost.com\/entry\/democratic-socialists-jamaal-bowman-israel-trip_n_61aa9825e4b07fe201279ebc\">HuffPost reported<\/a> that \u201cnone [of the NPC] voted against the statement that the body ultimately issued\u201d, and no dissenting position is expressed.<\/p>\n<p>To explain their decision, the NPC stated, \u201cwe have seen considerable movement from Representative Bowman\u201d. There is no explanation of what this movement was, and the claim is dubious considering Bowman ignored BDSWG\u2019s explicit request that he forgo participation in the J Street Town Hall just days before. The statement promises the formation of a committee to deal with accountability for elected officials as standard HR disarmament. Though the NPC \u201cstrongly condemn[ed]\u201d Bowman\u2019s actions, he remains a member. The work of the statement is in trying to mitigate the conflict and deliver the news that it&#8217;s going to be status quo without incurring too much pushback.<\/p>\n<h4><b>The forces at play<\/b><\/h4>\n<p>Within DSA, Afrosocialists and Socialists of Color Caucus (Afrosoc), DSA Muslim caucus, and of course BDSWG all supported expulsion. Following their first statement, BDSWG became a kind of alternate political center, broadcasting updates and sharing chapter statements as they came out. The NPC acknowledged the call for expulsion on November 16 but did not give any political guidance or public comment until the time of their statement two weeks later, on December 2. BDSWG, by merit of their position, had legitimacy to speak on the issue and were invited to participate in the meeting with Bowman, but they were public about their positions and thus filled the vacuum.<\/p>\n<p>Political formations <a href=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/2021\/11\/expel-jamaal-bowman\/\">Tempest<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/cosmonautmag.com\/2021\/11\/letter-for-democracy-not-democrats\/\">Marxist Unity Group<\/a>, and Libertarian Socialist Caucus were the groups in support of discipline. Socialist Majority Caucus (SMC) and North Star formed the main opposition to discipline, having authored and circulated the <i>For Unity<\/i> letter. Emerge and Red Star took no position, nor did Reform &amp; Revolution. The former members of the Collective Power Network (CPN) were split, with one section <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/@workerism\/unity-with-what-a-reply-on-congressman-bowman-f3a9277d9d4d\">supporting expulsion<\/a> and another firmly against. Bread &amp; Roses, too, was split, with members signing the <i>For Unity<\/i> statement and their website publishing <a href=\"https:\/\/socialistcall.com\/2021\/12\/02\/jamaal-bowman-dsa-discipline\/\">two<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/socialistcall.com\/2021\/12\/02\/jamaal-bowman-dsa-palestine-debate\/\">opposing<\/a> views of the situation.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_4904\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4904\" style=\"width: 799px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-4904\" src=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Palestinian solidarity protest. Sign reads &quot;Not war, its colonialism; not eviction its ethnic cleansing; not conflict its occupation; not complicated its genocide.&quot;\" width=\"799\" height=\"533\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-scaled-600x400.jpg 600w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-1200x800.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/PALESTINIAN-SOLIDARITYsm-1800x1200.jpg 1800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 799px) 100vw, 799px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-4904\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">In recent years the Palestine Solidarity movement has grown rapidly. This summer witnessed large protests against the siege of Sheikh Jarrah all over the world. Photo by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/shefftim\/51197905761\/in\/photolist-2m1bDF8-5Tk8cY-5PSBWr-2kYSUbe-2kYRLSr-oz8n6p-2kYVNeV-2kYRNbU-2kYRLCJ-2m1cHZU-5SVdNr-5QpDHj-4NRmJo-216By6K-2m13XZM-oz4ciy-2kYNgUd-2m1cHG9-2kYAQda-2m181Gq-oyQYyD-2kYAQ9T-ohDDjk-optqzP-2kYJp5A-ohDu5t-2m115iy-ox2q55-oz7HAp-ox4rXE-oz8KwM-ox51ff-ox1dob-ohBWfZ-ohzKSS-ohxLiW-oARi2R-oz3mSi-2m1bDKb-oz6n15-ohCmkU-oyM8fz-2m17Zsw-ox3VVL-2m1fEu2-oyRfy7-oz1GnG-ohya9V-ecmGfU-oyPeLB\">Tim Dennell<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>These groups fell where they did because the underlying tension in this situation was regarding DSA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/newpol.org\/building-class-power-not-electoralism-is-the-future-of-the-left\/\">electoralist orientation<\/a>. Not to be confused with elections as a tactic, electoralism is a commitment to elections as <i>the<\/i> force that will make change, where proximity to elected officials is used as the measure of \u201cpower.\u201d The Bowman affair is not the first time there have been tensions around electoralism, and it won\u2019t be the last. What made this especially sharp is that 1) Bowman\u2019s offenses were clear and repeated; 2) there was no excuse as there had been for AOC in voting for a package deal \u2013 Bowman voted on these as standalone items; 3) it was over Palestine, which is not only a <a href=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/2021\/12\/do-comrades-cross-picket-lines\/\">central anti-imperialist struggle<\/a>, but important in the political shift of \u201cnew DSA\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/L4VQTxc6Ae\">in 2017<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The issues were never in question: Bowman\u2019s actions are clear, and many Palestinian\/BDS movement groups made strong statements for separation of membership. The opposition to discipline was entirely about the premium placed on elected officials, and so opponents tried to shift away from the politics into the domain of \u201cmembership norms\u201d, obscuring the situation and flattening out the role politicians play.<\/p>\n<p>The former CPN people and others were politically divided because they had just argued vociferously for a position they represented as an anti-imperialist orientation for DSA at the convention in August, while also being committed electoralists. Bread &amp; Roses also styled themselves as internationalists, though they\u2019ve embraced electoralism to such an extent that B&amp;R members were <a href=\"https:\/\/socialistcall.com\/2021\/08\/06\/dsa-dirty-break-electoral-strategy\/\">instrumental<\/a> in defeating the caucus\u2019s own \u201cdirty break\u201d policy at this year\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/2021\/09\/dsa-sliding-right-under-biden\/\">convention<\/a>. In holding a contradictory position that claims to be internationalist while having a primarily electoralist perspective, the crisis split loyalties and saw fighters on both sides of the expulsion question from these groups. This helps understand how Hadas Thier could be an <a href=\"https:\/\/jacobinmag.com\/2021\/07\/left-progressive-palestine-israel-bds-lamont-hill-plitnick-except-for-palestine-book-review\">ardent defender<\/a> of Palestine in Jacobin this summer, and then shift entirely to <a href=\"https:\/\/jacobinmag.com\/2021\/11\/democratic-socialists-j-street-bds-israel-palestine-iron-dome-aoc\">defending Bowman<\/a> four months later. When push comes to shove, the \u201crelationship with the electeds\u201d is just more important.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"pullquote\">In holding a contradictory position that claims to be internationalist while having a primarily electoralist perspective, the crisis split loyalties and saw fighters on both sides of the expulsion question from these groups.<\/aside>\n<p>SMC and North Star have neither principles nor any misgivings about electoralism\u2019s insistence that it comes first. They were able to anchor the DSA right\u2019s opposition to expulsion through the <i>For Unity<\/i> letter, pulling along the B&amp;R right and others. Their strategy was to accumulate the names of well-known figures in DSA, elected officials, and organizational leaders as signatories, while simultaneously attempting to undermine the chapters who made calls for expulsion by naming out opponents to their chapters\u2019 decisions. As noted above, no chapters endorsed their statement, but that was never the point. The message was clear, however, that these figures with clout were putting their fingers on the scale and elected officials were declaring that they did not want any expectations of them either.<\/p>\n<p>Tempest, LSC, and Marxist Unity were the organized groups on the side for discipline, engaging in the debates, chronicling the chapter calls for expulsion, and participating as members in chapter discussions where they existed. The inverse of the SMC-bloc, these groups were not invested in electoralism and could dive in collectively. The activity in DSA pushing for discipline was far beyond the reach of any of these groups and was largely unexpected \u2013 no group can claim that they \u201cmade this happen\u201d.<\/p>\n<h4><b>Results<\/b><\/h4>\n<p>Where does this leave us? In the immediate aftermath, the decision not to expel Bowman has <a href=\"https:\/\/electronicintifada.net\/blogs\/ali-abunimah\/dsa-fails-palestine-test-giving-jamaal-bowman-pass\">tarnished<\/a> DSA\u2019s reputation as a principled ally of the Palestinian struggle. Undoubtedly, Bowman\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/bowman.house.gov\/press-releases?ID=B6D5D80C-356C-4DA9-802D-D8348B2F40AB\">Green New Deal in Schools<\/a> legislation that DSA is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dsausa.org\/calendar\/green-new-deal-for-public-schools-campaign-launch\/\">prioritizing<\/a> played a significant role in the leadership&#8217;s calculations.<\/p>\n<p>In the moment of truth, the NPC decided it to place the needs of a politician above the organization\u2019s principles\u2013in this case saying that you cannot continue to be a member if you actively vote for $4 billion for ethnic cleansing, participate in a propaganda tour, then, while there\u2019s outrage in your socialist organization, go do a town hall with the very same Zionist PR firm. Words have no meaning if this is what \u201cunwavering support\u201d for the Palestinian solidarity movement looks like.<\/p>\n<p>The NPC\u2019s statement is as much an assurance to other \u201cDSA electeds\u201d as it is a message to the membership. The irony is that this will permanently relegate DSA to the position of junior partner in the eyes of these politicians \u2013 there is no reason to take any demand from DSA seriously if you can depend on the organization\u2019s support as you flagrantly violate its positions.<\/p>\n<p>In the process, there\u2019s a shift in what it means to be a member. Bowman can be \u201cin DSA\u201d despite actively working against DSA\u2019s stated values because he is a star member. Any public official, trade union leader, or high-profile commentator in DSA\u2019s orbit have a different set of standards applied to them because of the perceived benefit they have for the organization. It is OK for Bowman to vote for arming an apartheid state, or for AOC to increase border militarization, because they are important. When criticism is levied, that same understanding of their unequal weight is not applied, and they\u2019re simply \u201cmembers\u201d. (Bowman of course never addressed his fellow DSA members throughout the crisis \u2013 he worked through private meetings with leaders and depended on them to handle the situation on his behalf.)<\/p>\n<p>For all the discussion of people being against expulsion as a political \u201cpurge\u201d, many of these same people who cried bloody murder over the notion of removing Bowman from DSA demanded that Socialist Alternative members be expelled from DSA. It&#8217;s not a categorical rejection of expulsions (DSA expels people all the time), but the parameters of who is a valuable member is slanted towards \u201cimportant people\u201d and away from those deemed too far left.<\/p>\n<p>The NPC has spoken and they will not expel Bowman. There is no other mechanism to force this issue. But let\u2019s be real: the only reason there was discussion and debate is because it was forced by a wide layer of members who said this is too far. That is an important development in the life of DSA. We can <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1KzlasFUnp2mkp-W16LQP2_FUBoC_PyZzhDUbcZkVFpI\/edit?usp=sharing\">register our dissent<\/a> on the NPC\u2019s decision and point out the democratic issues, but this episode is now over. Rather than continuing to litigate expulsion, we should not lose focus on what matters here: Palestine. Let this be an <a href=\"https:\/\/palestine.dsausa.org\/\">opportunity<\/a> to fuel solidarity and BDS, and to focus that effort on the state.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After weeks of public debate about DSA&#8217;s relationship to Congressional Representative Jamaal Bowman, DSA&#8217;s leadership announced that they will not expel Bowman. <strong>Andy Sernatinger<\/strong> reports on how the crisis unfolded and examines the forces at play.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":4906,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,7],"tags":[28,254,181],"class_list":["post-4902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-article","category-debate","tag-dsa","tag-jamaal-bowman","tag-palestine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/on-not-expelling.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4902\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4906"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tempestmag.org\/test02\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}